We have an ontology, we the materialists pro Newton+Democritus. The positivists do not have one
I am a partisan of Isaac Newton and Democritus. You will tell me — I am not the only one. And yes, I am the only one. And I challenge all those who hold physics degrees, philosophy degrees — to come polemicize under this video or come polemicize — try to defend their scam — on my blog.
Let me explain. Does the Moon exist? Yes — the Moon exists. Does it exist when nobody is looking at it? Yes — humans in general agree. Well, no — not the physicists. Orthodox physicists — the credentialed ones — do not agree. The Moon has no existence in itself. That is the discussion. In itself — does the Moon exist when nobody is looking at it? Does the Moon have an intrinsic existence in itself? Well, no — those credentialed in physics — physics teachers — university, middle school, high school — refuse to admit it. For them, the in-itself existence of the Moon is metaphysics.
What is metaphysics? It is what lies beyond the real — or else it is a matter of classification — but the current meaning is: beyond the real. But what is the real? Well — for me — materialist — partisan of Democritus and Newton — the real is what exists intrinsically without anyone seeing the thing. How do we know it? Well, we know it through our experiences. Except we are not saying that what is real would only be our experiences.
The materialists — the true ones — therefore orthodemocritists — those who are the heirs of Democritus — the partisans of atomOs. Yes — atomOs — not eutomes — not the easily breakable ones. They tell you "hydrogen atom." But no — it is not an atom — it is a eutome. The hydrogen eutome is easily breakable — since there is a nucleus and an electron orbiting it. Eutome — easily breakable. AtomOs — unbreakable.
Democritus — Leucippus — the others — the Indians — and certainly Africans before them — had clearly understood that in the end there exists only one particle — an unbreakable particle. And this — despite the big lies of Aristotle — who falsified Democritus's vocabulary — who superimposed a ballet — whereas Democritus was speaking of the dancers. The atomOs are the dancers.
Anyway! So the scam — I will detail it for you in the following short.
The ontology of orthodemocritist materialists explains the photons inside the hydrogen eutome
What is an ontology? An ontology — is what really exists. It is the foundation of a theoretical construction. It is the foundation upon which we can understand things. Except that the orthodox have had no ontology for a century. Why? They threw Newton in the trash. They threw Democritus in the trash — whereas Balmer — Johann Jakob Balmer — was giving them a clue to understand how photons are made, how photons fuse with one another — how the Lyman Alpha photon will fuse with the Balmer Alpha photon to give the Lyman Beta photon.
Obviously, an orthodemocritist — who has an ontology, who considers that Democritus's atomOs really exist — which are the ultimate particles — an orthodemocritist therefore — with ontology — easily understands that the Lyman Alpha photon contains a certain number of atomOs — and that these atomOs will fuse with the atomOs of the Balmer Alpha photon. Where? Well, inside the electron — since it is the electron that starts gesticulating. Where else would it be?
Anyway — so the two atomOs agglomerates — Lyman Alpha — 3/4 of the ionizing photon — Balmer Alpha — 5/36 of the ionizing photon — add up, fuse — and the sum gives 8/9 of the ionizing photon — and that is the Lyman Beta photon that comes out. There you have a reasoning with ontology — everything is explained by corpuscles.
In reality, there exists only one serious ontology — that of Democritus. But what about the positivists, then? Well, the positivists do not need one. For them, it is — do the calculations and then shut up — do the calculations — and since the calculations predict well —
Except that they have an unrecognized hero — a hidden hero. Who was doing calculations? Who was predicting many planetary motions? Well, it is Ptolemy. Ptolemy — the cretin — he is a cretin who had forgotten Philolaus — Pythagoras's companion. The cretin Ptolemy believed that the Earth was at the center — and he did those stupid calculations like that!
The scam of positivism: Being falsifiable on everything EXCEPT ON ITS ABSENCE OF ONTOLOGY
3rd short on the scam of the positivists.
The positivists tell us that we — materialists — partisans of Newton and Democritus — are doing metaphysics. Parenthesis — go read Lenin. Lenin mocks this reproach of being metaphysicians. "Materialism and Empirio-criticism" — chapter 1, paragraph 1. He mocks them. He speaks of those people as "titled clowns called professors."
The positivists accuse us of having an ontology. The positivists say: it is enough that perceptions — what we receive from them — allow us freely to invent a grid — that this grid be coherent and pertinent. They have no need to reflect on what is really happening — in itself — in the real world. For them, the real world does not exist.
And how do they do it? Well — they invented a theory — their theory — which does not need an ontology — which does not need a real world — for which the real world is called metaphysics.
But then — these people who say that a theory must be falsifiable — that a theory must be able to be criticized — these people pretend that their own theory — positivism — therefore relativity, quantum mechanics — has no need to be falsifiable concerning the in-itself. They pretend they have the right to say that the debate on the real world as it actually functions — therefore the debate on the Moon really existing — has no reason to be.
Parenthesis — when you see the Moon, have you ever asked yourself the question: where is it at this moment? It is not where you see it — since it has moved in one second. The Sun — in 8 minutes — has moved. Where is it? Except that — that is a materialist reasoning. When we see the Sun somewhere — the Sun has moved. Well, there — we are forbidden to think about that. It is an instantaneous reasoning — and it is forbidden. Why? Because it leads us to conceive of the Sun as existing in itself.
April 25, 2026
